The use of "Direct-mail" as a technology for promoting educational services gives an
educational organization the opportunity to reach a wide target audience in order to form
the loyalty and commitment of consumers (including the teaching staff as an internal
consumer), and, accordingly, stimulate sales of the proposed educational service.
8. Bibliographic references
Asarta, C.J., & Schmidt, J.R. (2020). The effects of online and blended experience on
outcomes in a blended learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education,
44, 100708.
Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of
Peking Higher education institution. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies,
2(2), 113‒115.
Dang, Y. M., Zhang, Y. G., Ravindran, S., & Osmonbekov, T. (2016). Examining student
satisfaction and gender differences in technology-supported, blended
learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 27(2), 119.
De Guzman, M.J.J. (2020). Business administration students’ skills and capability on
synchronous and asynchronous alternative delivery of learning. Asian Journal of
Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 28‒34.
Goudeau, S., Sanrey, C., Stanczak, A., Manstead, A., & Darnon, C. (2021). Why
lockdown and distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to
increase the social class achievement gap. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(10),
1273-1281.
Graham, C.R. (2009). Blended learning models. In Encyclopedia of Information Science
and Technology. Second Edition (pp.375‒382). IGI Global.
Graham, C.R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In Handbook
of distance education (pp.351‒368). Routledge.
Graham, C.R. (2018). Current research in blended learning. Handbook of distance
education, 173‒188.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315296135-15/current-
research-blended-learning-charles-graham
Harris, R.A., & Nikitenko, G.O. (2014). Comparing online with brick-and-mortar course
learning outcomes: An analysis of quantitative methods curriculum in public
administration. Teaching Public Administration, 32(1), 95‒107.
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Examining some assumptions and limitations of research
on the effects of emerging technologies for teaching and learning in higher
education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 536‒543.
Kopcha, T.J., Ding, L., Neumann, K.L., & Choi, I. (2016). Teaching technology integration
to k-12 educators: A ‘Gamified’approach. TechTrends, 60(1), 62‒69.
Subhash, S., & Cudney, E.A. (2018). Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic
review of the literature. Computers in human behavior, 87, 192‒206.
Thai, N.T.T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom
design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend”