competence lies primarily in the student's ability to conduct a varied discourse regardless of their
chosen specialty and the ability to improve the quality of communication in a professional
environment. For junior students, modern educational institutions offer several specialized
disciplines aimed at developing a general outlook. Such an approach is very important for the
ability to recognize the peculiarities of foreign cultures and to use the experience in practice.
Moreover, an economic specialty usually contains applied terminology that forms its professional
economic discourse. Therefore, the ability to distinguish a professional from other scientific
discourse will be a factor in improving the quality of one's competence. The current practice of
universities is to use interactive technologies to improve sociolinguistic competence. The priority
is to introduce tools for group projects and encourage students to communicate with
representatives of foreign cultures. Moreover, this practice can have a positive impact on student
performance. Learning English or German will be the highest priority, as these languages are
used all over the world and have many advantages. Firstly, the use of English provides access to
many educational materials written in English. Secondly, the ability to use English and identify
the style of speech can improve the quality of perception, analysis, and processing of the material.
The practice of educational institutions to improve the quality of sociolinguistic competence
development also involves the use of digital technologies. The use of such tools will directly affect
the student's learning potential. An effective and appropriate tool is the implementation of
creative tasks, as their implementation can improve the level of a student's vocabulary and serve
as a factor in their linguistic development. This practice is used in the vast majority of modern
educational institutions aimed at training highly qualified specialists. Therefore, junior economics
students should study economic disciplines with the practice of communicating with
representatives of other cultures in mind. They also need to train their professional and everyday
discourse using modern digital and interactive technologies.
6. Bibliographic references
Bobrikova, O.S, & Ivanova, V.I. (2016). Sociolinguistic competence in the professional activity of
an English teacher. Yaroslav ped. Bulletin, 3, 155-159
Bohórquez-Alba, M. Y., & Rincón-Moreno, Y. A. (2018). La expresión oral: estrategias pedagógicas
para su fortalecimiento. (Trabajo de grado – Maestría) Universidad Pedagógica y
Tecnológica de Colombia. https://repositorio.uptc.edu.co/handle/001/2345
Celce-Murcia, M. (2018). Rethinking the Role of Communicative Competence in Language
Teaching. En E. Alcón & M. P. Sanfont (Eds.), Intercultural Language Use and Language
Learning (pp. 41-57).
Chapelle, C. A. (2010). Research for practice: a look at issues in technology for second language
learning. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 27-30. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44224
Childs, S. (2018). Student Voice and Linguistic Identity: Digital Badging as a Tool for Retention
of First Year and First-Generation Undergraduates. Journal of English Linguistics, 46(3),
186-198. https://doi. org/10.1177/0075424218783444
Djatmika, D., Wibowo, A. H., & Sugini, S. (2018). Teacher Non-Verbal Behavior as Part of
Multimodal Interaction to Children with Autism. Advances in Social Science, Education,
and Humanities Research, 166, 75-79.
Fuertes, M., Soler, C., & Klee, C. A. (2021). Sociolingüística aplicada a la enseñanza del español.
Journal of Spanish Language Teaching, 8(2), 105-113.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23247797.2021.2019448