Accordingly, the first component of professional competence reflects the teacher's attitude toward their
work. This is evident in their interest in education and training activities, their desire for creative fulfillment,
their orientation towards scientific endeavors, their motivation to achieve success, their self-assessment of
performance, and their focus on collaboration with colleagues. At this stage, motivation is often defined as
both a focus on educational activities and a focus on scientific pursuits. In this context, motivation becomes
a factor in choosing between practical teaching activities and engaging in research. The main drivers of
motivation, in this case, include factors such as salary levels, conducive communication conditions, and
opportunities for innovation. When making this choice, individuals believe that this path enables them to
fully realize their potential (Bazeliuk et al., 2021, p. 550).
The innovative professional activity of a higher education teacher can be defined as the "experimental and
research activities conducted by pedagogical staff aimed at the development, experimentation, testing,
implementation, and application of pedagogical innovations" (Kozak, 2012, p. 50). These definitions
emphasize that the innovative professional activity of a higher education teacher is characterized by a
creative approach, idea generation, conducting experimental research, and implementing novel approaches
in pedagogical practice. As such, a teacher can fulfill various roles in this context, including being an author,
developer, researcher, user, and promoter of new pedagogical technologies, theories, and concepts
(Caldwell, 2020, p. 13)
Innovative pedagogical activity encompasses interconnected components, both external and internal. The
external components include the goal, means of achievement, the object of influence, subjects of activity,
and results. The internal components comprise motivation, content, and operations. Similar to any activity,
including pedagogical activities, it serves several functions, namely gnostic, design, constructive,
communicative, and organizational functions (Marchenko, 2016, p. 30).
V. Sayuk has identified the functional components that comprise the structure of a teacher's pedagogical
activity: gnostic, design, constructive, organizational, and communicative components (Sayuk, 2016,
p. 35). These components highlight the specific knowledge and skills that a higher education teacher must
possess. The gnostic component pertains to the teacher's capacity to acquire new knowledge, synthesize
and systematize it in alignment with pedagogical objectives. It involves analyzing pedagogical situations,
engaging in search and heuristic activities, and comprehending the psychological characteristics of
students, as well as the intricacies of the educational process. Additionally, it entails evaluating one's
pedagogical activities and identifying both positive outcomes and areas for improvement.
The design component of the teacher's pedagogical activity encompasses the capacity to identify long-term
and promising goals for education and upbringing, as well as the strategies and methods necessary to
achieve them. The constructive component involves the selection and structuring of educational
information, as well as the teacher's ability to design activities and guide students' educational and cognitive
processes. It also involves monitoring and maintaining a coherent knowledge system. The organizational
component pertains to the teacher's aptitude for organizing both student activities and their instructional
approach. This includes selecting appropriate methods for presenting information, choosing various types
of educational and cognitive activities that align with the system's goals, and effectively managing their
actions and behavior during direct interaction with students. The communicative component entails the
ability to establish meaningful interactions between the teacher and students to achieve pedagogical
objectives. It also involves cultivating pedagogically appropriate relationships and ensuring the overall
effectiveness of the pedagogical activities (Sayuk, 2012, p. 60).
L. Kozak has identified several key characteristics of pedagogical creativity. These include a heightened
level of social and moral consciousness, a thinking style characterized by search and transformation, well-
developed intellectual and logical abilities (such as analysis, justification, explanation, and identification of
essential elements), a propensity for problem-oriented thinking, creative imagination, and a well-cultivated