EL MOVIMIENTO DE ACCESO ABIERTO O LA “E-DEMOCRACIA”: NACIMIENTO, CRECIMIENTO, PROBLEMAS Y SOLUCIONES
Palabras clave:
acceso abierto, investigación científica, democracia, repositorio institucional, mandato.Resumen
Empezamos con una definición del movimiento “acceso abierto” (OA, siglas del término en inglés y AA, siglas del término en español) y la razón por la cual nació. Luego, presentamos y explicamos en qué consisten las dos vías principales del OA (la vía dorada y la vía verde) así como el objetivo de dicho movimiento. Se explica en qué consisten algunos conceptos claves, tales como “repositorio institucional”, “autoarchivo”, “mandato institucional” y “directorio de revistas en OA”. También examinamos el crecimiento y los beneficios del movimiento OA, y damos sugerencias que las universidades, los estudiantes universitarios y los investigadores del mundo entero ayuden a promover el movimiento OA y hacer que la ciencia sea verdaderamente universal.
Citas
Aronson, B. (2004) “Improving online access to medical information for low income countries” The New England Journal of Medicine 350: 966-968. URL: http://content.nejm.org/ cgi/content/full/350/10/966 [18/05/12].
Björk, B-C., A. Roos & M. Lauri (2008). “Global annual volume of peer reviewed scholarly articles and the share available via different Open Access options”. Artículo presentado en la 12th International Conference on Electronic Publishing (ELPUB), Toronto, 25-27, junio, 2008. URL: http://elpub. scix.net/cgibin/works/Show?178_elpub2008 [18/05/12].
Bothma, T.J.D. (ed.) (2010). IFLA World Report 2010. IFLA/FAIFE World Report Series, Vol. VIII. Federación Internacional de Asociaciones de Bibliotecas e Instituciones. URL: http://www.ifla-world-report.org/files/uploaded/ ifla_wr/ IFLA- WR-2010-Analysis-and-Conclusions.pdf [18/05/12].
Brody, T. & S. Harnad (2004). “Comparing the impact of Open Access (OA) vs. nonOA articles in the same journals”. Revista D-Lib 0. URL: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10207 [18/05/ 12].
Brody, T., S. Harnad & L. Carr (2006). “Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact: research articles”. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57:1060-1072.
Carr, L. & S. Harnad (2005). Keystroke economy: a study of the time and effort involved in self-archiving. URL: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/14418 [18/05/12].
Chan, L. (2004). “Supporting and enhancing scholarship in the digital age: the role of open access institutional repositories”. Canadian Journal of Communication 29:277-300. URL: http://eprints.rclis.org/achive/00002590 [18/05/12].
Craig, I.D., A.M. Plume, M.E. McVeigh, J. Pringle & M. Amin (2007). “Do open access articles have greater citation impact? A critical review of the literature”. Journal of Informetrics 2007: 239-248.
Davies, P. & H. Walters (2011). “The impact of free access to the scientific literature: a review of recent research”. Journal of the Medical Library Association 99:208-217.
Dickson, D. (2011). “Open access is not just about citations”. SciDevNet. URL: http:/www.scidevnet/en/editorials/open-access-not-just-about-citations-1.html [23/02/12].
Durenceau, E. (2011). “Study finds open access manuscripts ‘good enough’ without copyediting”. URL: http://libraries.mit.edu/sites/news/access-manuscripts/5538/ [23/02/12].
Drott, M.C. (2006). “Open Access”. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) 40:79-109.
Eysenbach, G. (2006). “Citation advantage of open access articles”. PLoS Biology 4:692-98.
Gargouri, Y., C. Hajjem, V. Lariviere, Y. Gingras, T. Brody, L. Carr & S. Harnad (2010). “Self-selected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research”. PLoS ONE 5: e13636. URL: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18493 [23/02/12].
Goodman, D. (2004). “The criteria for open access.” Serials Review 30 (versíon anterior al arbitraje).
Harnad, S. (1994). Subversive proposal. URL: http://www.arl. org/sc/subversive/i-overture-the-subversive-proposal.shtml [23/02/12].
Harnad, S. (2003). “Eprints: electronic preprints and postprints” en Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 377-392. New York: Marcel Dekker.
Harnad, S. (2006). “Opening access by overcoming Zeno’s paralysis” en N. Jacobs (ed.), 73-86.
Harnad, S. (2008). The University’s Mandate to Mandate Open Access. URL: http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php? /archives/358-guid.html [18/05/12].
Harnad, S. (2011a). “Open Access to research: changing behaviour through university and funder mandates”. eJournal of edemocracy 3:33-41. URL: http://www.jedem.org [23/02/12].
Harnad, S. (2011b). “Open access is a research community matter, not a publishing community matter”. Lifelong Learning in Europe 162:117-118.
Harnad, S., T. Brody, F. Vallieres, L. Carr, S. Hitchcosk, Y. Gingras, C. Oppenheim & E.R. Hilfet (2008). “The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access”. Serials Review 30:310-314.
Hedlund, T. & I. Rabow (2007). Open Access in the Nordic Countries – A State of the Art Report. Auspiciado por el Nordbib Programme. URL: http://wwwlink.gr/SELL/OA_reports/ NordicCountries.pdf [18/05/12].
Hitchcock, S. (2011). The effect of open access and down- loads (‘hits’) on citation impact: a bibliography of studies. URL: http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html [18/05/12].
Houghton, J.W., C. Steele & M. Henty (2004). “Research practices and scholarly communication in the digital environ- ment”. Learned Publishing 17:231-249.
Jacobs, N. (ed.) (2006). Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects. Oxford: Chandos.
Jantz, R.C. & M.C. Wilson (2008). “Institutional repositories: faculty deposits, marketing and the reform of scholarly communication”. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 34: 186-195.
Keefer, A. (2007). “Green, gold, or neither: author attitude and behaviour regarding open access”. European Science Editing 3:16-17.
Kennan, M.A. (2011). “Learning to share: mandates and open access”. Library Management 32:302-318.
Kenneway, M. (2011). “Author attitudes towards open access publishing”. TBI Communications on Behalf of Intech Open Access Publisher. URL: http://www.intechweb.org/public_files/Intech_OA_Apr11.pdf [03/06/11].
Laakso, M., P. Welling, H. Bukvoca, L. Nyman, B.C. Björk & T. Hedlund (2011). “The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009” PLoS ONE 6: e20961. URL: http://www.plosone.org/article/citationList.action?articleURI= info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0020961 [03/06/11].
Lawrence, S. (2001). “Online or invisible?” Revista Nature 411: 521. URL: http://www.neci.nec.com/lawrence/papers/online-nature01/ [03/06/11].
Look, H. (2004). “Open access: look both ways before crossing”. Serials: The Journal of the Serials Community 17:
-223.
Miguel, S., Z. Chinchilla-Rodríguez & F. de Moya-Anegón (2012). “Open access and scopus: a new approach to scientific visibility from the standpoint of access”. Journal of the Ame- rican Society for Information Science and Technology 63: 481-489.
Morris, S. (2007). “Will the parasite kill the host? Are institutional repositories a fact of life and does it matter?” Serials: The Journal of the Serials Community 20: 172-179.
Nicholas, D., H.R. Jamali & I. Rowlands (2006). “On the tips of their tongues: authors and their views on scholarly publishing”. Learned Publishing 19: 193-202.
Open Society Institute (2001). Iniciativa de Budapest para el Acceso Abierto. URL: http://www.soros.org/openaccess/read [03/06/11].
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (2009). Directorio de Revistas Open Access reconocidas por el ISI Web of Science. URL: http://www.ejbiotechnology.cl/proyecto/index.php [03/06/11].
Sale, A. (2006). “The acquisition of open access research papers·. Revista First Monday 11. URL: http://eprints.utas.edu.au/388/ [03/06/11].
Stix, G. (1994). “The spread of write. Trends on scientific communication”. Revista Scientific American 271: 106-111.
Suber, P. (2012). “Ensuring open access for publicly funded research”. Revista British Medical Journal 345: e5184 doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5184. URL: http://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e5184 [31/08/12].
Swan, A. (2006). “The culture of OA: researchers’ views and responses” en N. Jacobs (ed.), 52-59.
Swan, A. (2010). “The open access citation advantage: studies and results to date”. Technical Report, School of Electronics and Computer Science. Universidad de Southampton, Reino Unido.
Thomas, C. & R.H. McDonald (2007). “Measuring and compa- ring participation patterns in digital repositories”. Revista D-Lib 13. URL: http://dlib.org/dlib/september07/mcdonald/09 mcdonald.html [03/06/11].
Webster, P. (2012). “Humanities left behind in the dash for open access”. Research Fortnight. URL: http://www.resear- chresearch.com/index.php?option=com_news&template=rr_2col&view=article&articleId=1214091 [25/08/12]. (2011). Ulrich’s Global Serials Directory. URL: http://ul- richsweb.com/ulrichsweb/ [03/06/11].
Françoise Salager-Meyer estudió en la Universidad de León, Francia, y en la Universidad de Texas en Austin, EE.UU. Es la autora de numerosas publicaciones sobre el discurso médico escrito, mayormente desde una perspectiva diacrónica, global y multilingüística. En 1994 y 2004, se le confirió el Premio Horowitz por sus trabajos sobre la pragmática en la comunicación académica escrita. Fue la editora de la “Sección de Lengua y Medicina” de la segunda edición de la Encycplopedia of Language and Linguistics (Elsevier) y coordina actualmente el Multilingual and Multidisciplinary Group on Scientific Discourse Analysis.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2021 Françoise Salager Meyer ; Gastón Salas
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
