Introduction of interactive teaching methods in modern schools



Palabras clave:

Еducation, the future generation, modern schools, the evolution of education, innovative methods.


Modern society puts forward new challenges for education, one of which is training people who are able to express critical opinions, find a way of communication in a new territory, who effectively establish new connections in a fast-moving reality. Intension, activity, independence, creativity, the ability to adapt to rapid changes – these personality traits are becoming the most important at the current stage of developing literature, and their formation requires using new approaches to the process of teaching literacy. Therefore, the purpose of the academic paper is to clarify the development of using innovative, non-standard, as well as critical thinking methods of teaching and learning at modern schools. In the course of the research, the following methods were used and applied, namely: analysis, synthesis, generalization, explanation and qualification of data. By the way, such outstanding modern and foreign scientists as O. Pometun, L. Pyrozhenko, as well as V. Bespalko, V. Monakhova paid particular attention to studying the issue of interactive learning methods and made a significant contribution in this direction. They explain innovations in education as an opportunity for interaction, being in the mode of conversation, dialogue, action. Moreover, their studies show that interactive learning makes it possible to significantly increase the percentage of learning the material, as it affects not only the student’s consciousness but also his feelings. The development of interactive learning elements can be found in the scientific works of V. Sukhomlynskyi, the works of innovative teachers of the 70-80s (V. Shatalov, E. Ilyin, S. Lysenkova, Sh. Amonashvili, etc.), the theory of developmental learning.

Biografía del autor/a

Viktoriia Bilyk, Khmelnytskyi National University, Ukraine.

Senior Lecturer, PhD in Pedagogy, Department of Technological and Professional Education and Decorative Arts, Khmelnytskyi National University, Ukraine.

Roman Banak, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Ukraine.

Deputy director for Educational and Methodological Work of the Educational Complex "Dominanta", Postgraduate Student, Department of Theory and Methods of Physics and Astronomy Teaching, National Pedagogical Dragomanov University, Ukraine.

Oleh Bardadym, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Ukraine.

Postgraduate Student of the Primary Education Department, Head of Computer Laboratories, Educational-Scientific Institute of Pedagogical Education, Social Work and Art, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Ukraine.

Mariia Sokal, The State institution «South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky», Ukraine.

Candidate of Philological Sciences (PhD in Philology), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Slavic Linguistics, The State institution «South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky», Ukraine.

Olena Anichkina, Zhytomyr State University named after Ivan Franko, Ukraine.

PhD (Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences) Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Chemistry Zhytomyr State University named after Ivan Franko, Ukraine.


Blyth, C. (2018). Immersive technologies and language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 225–232.

El-Sabagh, H.A. (2021). Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students' engagement. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 18, 53

Guerra, J., & Guevara, C. Y. (2017). Variables académicas, comprensión lectora, estrategias y motivación en estudiantes universitarios. Revista electrónica de investigación educativa, 19(2), 78–90. doi:10.24320/redie.2017.19.2.1125

Harackiewicz, J. M., & Hulleman, C. S. (2010). The importance of interest: The role of achievement goals and task values in promoting the development of interest. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(1), 42–52.

Honcharenko S. (1997). Ukrainian Pedagogical Dictionary. Kyiv: Lybid, 376mp.

Hrynevych, L. (2016). Concept of the New Ukrainian School. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine.

İlçin, N., Tomruk, M., Yeşilyaprak, S. S., Karadibak, D., & Savcı, S. (2018). The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in TURKISH physiotherapy students. BMC Med Educ 18, 291

Kostanjevec, S., Lovšin Kozina, F., & Erjavšek, M. (2018). The relationship between teachers’ education and their self-perceived competence for teaching home economics. Problems of education in the 21st century, 76(2), 175–187.

Kovalova, O. M., & Safargalina-Kornilova, N. A. (2016). Use of interactive teaching methods Innovative technologies in the system of professional training of students at KhNMU: materials of the XLVIII educational and methodological conference, Kharkiv, December 10, 2014. Kharkiv: KhNMU, 2014. Vol. 5. 114-118.

Lau, B. Y., Leong, R., Uljarevic, M., Lerh, J. W., Rodgers, J., & Hollocks, M. J. (2020). Anxiety in Young People with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Common and Autism-Related Anxiety Experiences and Their Associations with Individual Characteristics. Autism, 24(5), 1111–1126. doi:10.1177/1362361319886246

Nuthall, G. (2012). The Acquisition Of Conceptual Knowledge In The Classroom. SensePublishers, Rotterdam.

Pidgurska, V., Golubovska, I., Mykhailova, O., Humankova, O., & Grigorieva, T. (2023). Ue of innovative technologies for formation of economic competence of primary school students. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 1(48), 473–482.

Pometun, O., & Pyrozhenko, L. (2011). Interactive learning technologies: theory, practice, experience. K.: Publishing House, 135 p.

Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2012). Learning styles: where's the evidence? Med. Educ., 46, 634–635. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04273.x

Shaw, S., Gomes, P., Polotskaia, A., & Jankowska, A. (2015). The relationship between student health and academic performance: Implications for school psychologists. School Psychology International, 36.

Shevchuk, P., & Fenrich, F. (2005). Interactive teaching methods: Education. manual. Szczecin: WSAP Publishing House, 170 p.

Wininger, S. R., Redifer, J. L., Norman, A. D., & Ryle, M. K. (2019). Prevalence of learning styles in educational psychology and introduction to education textbooks: a content analysis. Psychol. Learn. Teach, 18, 221–243. doi: 10.1177/1475725719830301



Cómo citar

Bilyk, V. ., Banak, R. ., Bardadym, O. ., Sokal, M. ., & Anichkina, O. . (2023). Introduction of interactive teaching methods in modern schools. Revista Eduweb, 17(2), 199–209.