Innovative digital technologies in the pr-management specialists training for public administration bodies on the blended learning
Palabras clave:digital technologies of higher education institutions, professionals training under crisis conditions, PR-management expert training, public administration.
Objective. The paper examined the information digital technologies effectiveness in the PR-management specialists training for public administration bodies on the blended learning model. The research methodology is based on a mixed-methods approach and a combination of qualitative and quantitative design to fully cover the use of digital technology in the training of professionals under martial law. Results. It has been demonstrated that through a combination of different digital technologies in the higher education institutions of Ukraine, depending on the stage of training and type of lesson, a flexible inclusive approach was used, making provision for the creation of common standards for teaching through digital technology. Innovative digital technologies were used depending on the stage of the educational process (communication and interaction; conducting lectures and seminars; transferring learning materials and exchanging them; digital content development; knowledge evaluation and academic performance rating). As the higher education institutions of Ukraine significantly improved the asynchronous learning models, the preparation level of both educators and students for the complete transition to asynchronous learning given the war was markedly higher. It is deemed that the flexible self-study model during the war ensures the general competencies development, however students have not mastered a sufficient level of professional practical competencies.
Asarta, C. J., & Schmidt, J. R. (2020). The effects of online and blended experience on outcomes in a blended learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 44, 100708.
Bao, W. (2020). COVID‐19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking Higher education institution. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(2), 113‒115.
Dang, Y. M., Zhang, Y. G., Ravindran, S., & Osmonbekov, T. (2016). Examining student satisfaction and gender differences in technology-supported, blended learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 27(2), 119.
De Guzman, M. J. J. (2020). Business administration students’ skills and capability on synchronous and asynchronous alternative delivery of learning. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 3(1), 28‒34.
Gómez López, I., & Pérez Sánchez, Y. (2021). Una propuesta de reflexión sobre la enseñanza de la gramática inglesa. Revista Científica Del Amazonas, 4(7), 40-52. https://doi.org/10.34069/RA/2021.7.04
Goudeau, S., Sanrey, C., Stanczak, A., Manstead, A., & Darnon, C. (2021). Why lockdown and distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to increase the social class achievement gap. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(10), 1273-1281.
Graham, C. R. (2009). Blended learning models. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology. Second Edition (pp. 375‒382). IGI Global.
Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In Handbook of distance education (pp. 351‒368). Routledge.
Graham, C. R. (2018). Current research in blended learning. Handbook of distance education, 173‒188. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315296135-15/current-research-blended-learning-charles-graham
Harris, R. A., & Nikitenko, G. O. (2014). Comparing online with brick and mortar course learning outcomes: An analysis of quantitative methods curriculum in public administration. Teaching Public Administration, 32(1), 95‒107.
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63 (5), 564‒569.
Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and teacher education, 29, 76‒85.
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Examining some assumptions and limitations of research on the effects of emerging technologies for teaching and learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 536‒543.
Kopcha, T. J., Ding, L., Neumann, K. L., & Choi, I. (2016). Teaching technology integration to k-12 educators: A ‘Gamified’approach. TechTrends, 60(1), 62‒69.
Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (2022). The sixteenth academic rating of the Higher Education Institutions of Ukraine. Retrivied from: https://mon.gov.ua/ua/news/oprilyudneno-shistnadcyatij-akademichnij-rejting-zvo-ukrayini
Ożadowicz, A. (2020). Modified blended learning in engineering higher education during the COVID-19 lockdown ‒ Building automation courses case study. Education Sciences, 10(10), 292.
Papastylianou, A., & Alyfantis, G. (2021, April). The distance education process in the National School of Public Administration and Local Government (ESDDA): a necessity or an opportunity to modernise learning? In 2021 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 880‒884). IEEE.
Park, J. Y., Byun, C. G., Sung, C. S., & Choi, D. S. (2018). A study on the effectiveness of entrepreneurship education programs in higher education institutions: A case study of Korean graduate programs. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(3), 26.
Petronzi, R., & Petronzi, D. (2020). The Online and Campus (OaC) Model as a Sustainable Blended Approach to Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Response to COVID-19. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 4(4), 498‒507.
Selvanathan, M., Hussin, N. A. M., & Azazi, N. A. N. (2020). Students learning experiences during COVID-19: Work from home period in Malaysian Higher Learning Institutions. Teaching Public Administration, 0144739420977900.
Smith, K., & Hill, J. (2019). Defining the nature of blended learning through its depiction in current research. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(2), 383‒397.
Subhash, S., & Cudney, E. A. (2018). Gamified learning in higher education: A systematic review of the literature. Computers in human behavior, 87, 192‒206.
Thai, N. T. T., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107, 113‒126.
Tirziu, A. M., & Vrabie, C. (2015). Education 2.0: E-learning methods. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 376‒380.
Raven, A., & Park, C. W. (2015). Information quality as a determinant of task-technology fit in using communication technology for simple task. Issues in Information Systems, 16(1).
Umek, L., Keržic, D., Tomaževic, N., & Aristovnik, A. (2015). Moodle E-Learning System and Students’ Performance in Higher Education: The Case of Public Administration Programmes. International Association for Development of the Information Society.
Zhang, Z., Li, Z., Han, M., Su, Z., Li, W., & Pan, Z. (2021). An augmented reality-based multimedia environment for experimental education. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 80(1), 575‒590.
Derechos de autor 2022 Tetiana Mamatova, Iryna Chykarenko, Oleksii Chykarenko, Тetiana Kravtsova, Oleg Kravtsov
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.