The role of smart technologies in maintaining student motivation during distance learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2024.18.02.4

Keywords:

meaningful learning, online platforms, person-oriented learning, students’ purposefulness, rational thinking.

Abstract

Smart technologies are a common element of education, which have a positive impact on the organization of education, its efficiency, and the possibility of self-control. The aim of the study is to determine the role of smart technologies in the distance learning to maintain student motivation. The aim was achieved through the use of the methods of observation and analysis, calculations of the coefficient of oscillation, the coefficient of variation, and Spearman’s rank coefficient. Learning mechanisms provided for acquiring language knowledge, develop the consecutive interpreting skills, and master formal and informal communication styles. It was established that such learning mechanisms after the study enhanced students’ motivation of 82% for distance learning. Before the study, a high level of motivation was observed among only 21% of students. The results of the Stapel Scale showed that smart technologies (1.0) had the greatest impact on students’ motivation, which is related to the continuity of learning. The learning process had also the greatest impact on students’ dynamic adaptation (2.25). The conducted research is important for the development of students’ professional foreign language skills and enhancement of their motivation through the use of smart technologies during distance learning.

Author Biographies

Ilona Novak, Department of Foreign Languages, KROK University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Department of Foreign Languages, KROK University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Ihor Butsyk, National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Department of Pedagogy, National University of Life and Environmental Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Yuliia Hetman, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Department of English Philology, H.S. Skovoroda Kharkiv National Pedagogical University, Kharkiv, Ukraine.

Iryna Norenko, Alfred Nobel University, Dnipro, Ukraine.

Department of the Innovative Technologies in Psychology, Pedagogy, and Social Work, Alfred Nobel University, Dnipro, Ukraine.

Denys Derevianko, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Cherkasy, Ukraine.

Department of the Educational and Socio-Cultural Management and Social Work, Bohdan Khmelnytsky National University of Cherkasy, Cherkasy, Ukraine.

References

Abuhassna, H., & Alnawajha, S. (2023). The transactional distance theory and distance learning contexts: Theory integration, research gaps, and future agenda. Education Sciences, 13(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020112

Abuhassna, H., Busalim, A., Yahaya, N., Zakaria, M. A. Z. M., & Latif, A. B. A. (2023). Study from home! the antecedents and consequences of collaborative learning on Malaysian university students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 22, 71-95.

Ashiq, M., Rehman, S. U., Yousaf, A., & Safdar, M. (2023). Exploring the use of mobile technologies for learning: An empirical study of library and information science (LIS) students. Digital Library Perspectives, 39(4), 604-619. https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-04-2023-0032

Cavus, N., Mrwebi, S. E., Ibrahim, I., Modupeola, T., & Reeves, A. Y. (2022). Internet of things and its applications to smart campus: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(23), 17-35. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i23.36215

Committee on Publication Ethics. (2024). About COPE. COPE. https://publicationethics.org/about/our-organisation

Correa Cruz, L., López de Parra, L., Rojas Bahamón, M. J., & Arbeláez Campillo, D. (2017). Normatividad y estrategias de formación de profesores en tecnologías de la información y comunicación. Academia Y Virtualidad, 10(1).

Dmitrenko, N., Budas, I., Koliadych, Y., & Poliarush, N. (2021). Impact of formative assessment on students' motivation in foreign language acquisition. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 8(2), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.29038/EEJPL.2021.8.2.DMI

Dmitrenko, N. Ye., Voloshyna, O. V., Kizim, S. S., Mnyshenko, K. V., & Nahorniak, S. V. (2023). Smart education in the prospective teachers’ training. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3364, 38-53.

Giovannella, C. (2022). A year after the outbreak of COVID-19: How has evolved the students’ perception on the online learning? In Ludic, Co-design and Tools Supporting Smart Learning Ecosystems and Smart Education: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Smart Learning Ecosystems and Regional Development (pp. 105-121). Springer Singapore.

Ihnatova, O., Zhovnych, O., & Drobakha, L. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning in English teacher training. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 10(3), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2203377I

Kokaj, A., Kurshumlia, M., Vala-Kendusi, V., & Maloku, B. (2023). The effect of ICT in education and teaching: Student evaluation based verification. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(5), 255-264. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0135

Konovalenko, T. V., Nadolska, Y. A., Poyasok, T. B., & Striuk, A. M. (2023). Developing digital and ICT literacy skills for future foreign language teachers: A comparative and action research approach. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3482, 187-202.

Krasulia, A., Plotnikov, Y., & Zagoruiko, L. (2022). Hidden inequalities in education: Case of in-service English language teachers training in Ukraine. In Social inequality as a global challenge (pp. 243-279). River Publishers.

Li, M. (2023). A probe into college English teaching model under converged mobile learning. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Education and Training Technologies (pp. 1-7).

Li, Y., Qi, X., Saudagar, A. K. J., Muhammad, K., & Liu, S. (2023). Student behavior recognition for interaction detection in the classroom environment. Image and Vision Computing, 136, 104726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imavis.2023.104726

Long, J., & Lin, J. (2022). An empirical study on cultivating college students' cross-cultural communicative competence based on the artificial-intelligence English-teaching mode. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 976310. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976310

Lorenzo, N., & Gallon, R. (2018). Smart pedagogy for smart learning. Didactics of Smart Pedagogy: Smart Pedagogy for Technology Enhanced Learning, 41-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01551-0_3

Lorenzo, N., Gallon, R., Palau, R., & Mogas, J. (2021). New objectives for smart classrooms from industry 4.0. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 719-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09527-0

Metruk, R. (2022). Smartphone English language learning challenges: A systematic literature review. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079627

Nejković, V., & Andrejević, D. (2022). The impact of the use of clicker tools in academic classroom environments. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 10(3), 407-420. https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP2203407N

Oyetade, K., Harmse, A., & Zuva, T. (2023). Factors influencing students' use of e-learning technologies. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), 617-632. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.9.33

Oyetade, K. E., Zuva, T., & Harmse, A. (2020). Technology adoption in education: A systematic literature review. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems, 5(6), 108-112. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj050611

Petchamé, J., Iriondo, I., Korres, O., & Paños-Castro, J. (2023b). Digital transformation in higher education: A qualitative evaluative study of a hybrid virtual format using a smart classroom system. Heliyon, 9(6), e16675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16675

Petchamé, J., Iriondo, I., Mallol, R., & Solanellas, F. (2023a). Promoting students’ interaction in higher education: A reciprocal interview activity carried out during the first class session in management subjects. Education Sciences, 13(7), 730. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070730

Raza, S. A., & Khan, K. A. (2022). Knowledge and innovative factors: How cloud computing improves students’ academic performance. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 19(2), 161-183. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2020-0047

Sułkowski, Ł., Kolasińska-Morawska, K., Seliga, R., & Morawski, P. (2021). Smart learning technologization in the economy 5.0-the polish perspective. Applied Sciences, 11(11), 5261. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115261

Urbanetti, I., Autiero, M. R., Baraniello, V., & Giovannella, C. (2023). Community pacts and we4SLE as tools to support the implementation of smart learning ecosystems. In Conference on Smart Learning Ecosystems and Regional Development (pp. 115-128). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5240-1_8

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Novak, I., Butsyk, I., Hetman, Y. ., Norenko, I., & Derevianko, D. (2024). The role of smart technologies in maintaining student motivation during distance learning. Eduweb, 18(2), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2024.18.02.4

Issue

Section

Articles