TECNOLOGY AND GENDER: ORGANIZATIONAL KEYS
Keywords:
Keywords: Technology attitudes, gender differences, organizationAbstract
¡Nowadays, society is characterized by its complexity because of the interdependence generated between ideology, technology, economy, workplace, globalization, among others. Educational organizations should seek changes in its organizational culture tied to effective actions as the mainstreaming gender, learning styles, leadership models, mediation and assessment systems. It is relevant to make a thorough analysis of cultural barriers, institutions, attitudes and skills related to the Information and Communication Technology. The goals are: (a) to analyse the college student’s attitudes towards technology in educational organizations (b) to identify the organizational leadership models together with their learning styles (c) to selfevaluate the gender, technology as a mediator element in discussions for learning to manage emotions, thoughts and effective activities. The sample was constituted by 169 university students: 83, 05% female and 18, 6% males. It was applied the survey Gender Differences and Learning Styles regarding to Technology and Motivation.
References
Alonso, C. M. & Gallego, D. J. & Honey, P. (1999). Estilos de aprendizaje. Bilbao: Mensajero.
Alvesson, M. (2010). Self-oubters, strugglers, storytellers, surfers and others: Images of self-identities in organization studies. United Kingdom: Sage Publications.
American Association of University Women (AAUW) (2010). Why So Few? [http://www.aauw.org/learn/research/whysofew.cfm]
Araujo, U. & Sastre, G. (2008). El aprendizaje basado en problemas. Una nueva perspectiva de enseñanza en al
universidad. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Buchanan, D. & Bryman, A. (2009). Handbook of Organizational Research Methods. London: Sage Publications.
Cabero, J. (2010). Educación 2.0 ¿Marca, Moda o Nueva Visión de la Educación? http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2801
Calas, M. & Smircich, L. (1991). Voicing seduction to silence leardeships. Organization Studies, 12 (4), 567-602.
Castaño, C. et. al. (2008). Prácticas educativas en los entornos Web 2.0. Madrid: Síntesis.
Castaño, C. et al. (2008). La segunda brecha digital. Madrid: Cátedra.
Coleman, M. (1996). Barriers to career progress for women in education: the perceptions of female headteachers. Educational Research, 38 (3), 317–32.
Coronel et al. (2009). Work-family Conflicts and the Organizational Work Culture as Barriers to Women Educational Managers. Gender Work and Organization, vol. 17 (2), 219-239.
Czarmiawska, B. (2009). A Theory of organizing. Great Britain: Edward Elgar.
Díaz, M. D & Barroso, J. (2008). Guidelines for european content in educational organizations. En Calvo de Mora (eds.), Sharing responsabilities and networking through school process, 1-280. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
Díez, E. et. al. (2006). La cultura de género en las organizaciones educativas. Barcelona: Octaedro.
Fiedler. S., & Pata, K. (2009). Distributed learning environments and social software: in search for a framework of design. In S.
Hatzipanagos & S. Warburton (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Social Software and Developing Community Ontologies (pp. 151–164), Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
García, J. L. (2008). Aprendizaje, Estilos, Estilos de Aprendizaje y Modelos de Estilos de aprendizaje. [http://www.estilosdeaprendizaje.es/publicacion.html]
Gaver, W. W. (1996). Affordances for interaction: The social is material for design. Ecological Psychology, 8 (2), 111-129.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Hougton Mifflin.
Grace, G. (2000). Research and the challenges of contemporary school leardeship: The contribution of critical scholarship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 48 (3), 231-247.
Hargreaves, A. & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and nonsustainability of tree decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42 (1), 3- 41.
Hatcher, R. (2005). The distribution of leadership and power in schools. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26 (2), 253-267.
Instituto de la Mujer (2010). Instituto de la Mujer [http://www.inmujer.migualdad.es/mujer/e_igualdad.htm] consultado 02/06/2010.
Kember, D, Ho, A. & Hong, C. (2008). The importance of stablishing relevance in motivating student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, vol 9, 249-264.
Klamma et al. (2007). Social Software for Life-long learning. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (3), 72-83.
Lietz, P. & Matthews, B. (2007). Are values more important than learning approaches? Factors influencing student performance at an international university. Paper presented at the AARE 2006 Conference, Adelaide: Australia [http:www.aare.edu.au/06pap/lie06070.pdf] consultado 20/03/2010.
Machemer, P. L. & Crawford, P. (2007). Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8 (1), 9-30.
Mauldin, K. (2009). Gendered perceptions of learning and fairness when choice between exam types is offered. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10 (3), 253-264.
Maturana, H. R. (1997). De máquinas y Seres Vivos, autopoiesis de la organización de lo vivo. Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Daniel, L. G. (2003). Typology of analyti-cal and interpretational errors in quantitative and qualitative educational research. Current Issues in Education (On line), 6 (2) [http:cie.ed.asu.edu/volume6/number2/].
O’Reill, T. (2005). Web 2.0: Compact definition, retrieved April 20, 2009 from [http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2005/10/web20-compact-definition.html].
Parry, K. W. & Bryman, A. (2006). Leadership in organizations. In Clegg, C. Hardy, T.B. Lawrence & Nord, W.R. (Eds.) Handbook of organization studies (2ª editon), 447-468. London: Sage.
Pata, K. (2009). Modeling spaces for self-directed learning at university courses. Educational Technology & Society. 12 (3), 23-43.
Sainz, M. & López-Sáez, M. (2010). Gender differences in computer attitudes and the choice of tecnology-related occupations in a sample of secondary students in Spain. Computer & Education, 54, 578-587. UNESCO (2010). Informe Mundial sobre la Diversidad Cultural [http://www.uis.unesco.org/ev.php?ID=7961_201&ID2=DO_TOPIC].
Wiseman, A. W. (2010). The Uses of Evidence for Educational Policymaking: Global Contexts and International Trends. Review of Research in Education, 34, 1, 1-24.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 María Dolores Díaz Noguera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
