Sinergias lingüístico-literarias en la filología Ucraniana moderna
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2024.18.03.19Palabras clave:
Análisis semiótico, lingüística cognitiva, literatura comparada, narrativa cultural, crítica literaria.Resumen
Las investigaciones modernas en el campo de la filología ucraniana cada vez más combinan lingüística y literatura, demostrando un enfoque interdisciplinario para el estudio del idioma y la literatura. El trabajo realizado utilizó una estrategia limitada de búsqueda de datos relevantes en bases de datos como Google Scholar, Frontiersin, ResearchGate, Scopus, con las palabras clave "Interdisciplinariedad, lingüística, literatura". La búsqueda se centró en artículos publicados entre 2019 y 2024, escritos en inglés y que contienen estas palabras clave de acceso abierto, en comparación con artículos de conferencias. Los resultados indican la relevancia de este enfoque en el contexto de la creciente especialización de la investigación, ya que permite considerar los objetos de estudio desde diferentes perspectivas y utilizar métodos y enfoques de diferentes disciplinas científicas. El enfoque interdisciplinario en la filología ucraniana permite obtener una comprensión más profunda de los fenómenos del lenguaje y la literatura, estudiar su interacción e influencia mutua. Los profesionales en lingüística y literatura tienen la oportunidad de resolver problemas complejos juntos, utilizando diversos métodos y enfoques. Por lo tanto, se puede concluir que el enfoque interdisciplinario en el estudio de la filología ucraniana abre nuevas oportunidades para el desarrollo de la investigación científica, promoviendo el intercambio de conocimientos y el enriquecimiento de la comprensión del lenguaje y la literatura en el contexto de las demandas científicas actuales.
Citas
Abdulmughni, S.A.A. (2019). Stylistics, literary criticism, linguistics, and discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2), 412. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:171553637
Alic, L. (2020). Culturemes, agentivity, contyrastivity. Redefining Community in Intercultural Context, 9(1), 81-86. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=874356
Aliyeva, G.B. (2023). Text linguistics and the use of linguistic data in modern technologies: Prospects for development. Future of Social Sciences, 1(2), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2023.06.20.02
Aliyeva, G. B., Honcharuk, V., Pavliuk, N., Zinchenko, V., & Sivachenko, I. (2023). Revisão das tecnologias e métodos pedagógicos modernos no domínio da filologia de acordo com as normas Europeias (revisão de literatura). Revista on line de Política e Gestão Educacional, Araraquara, 27(esp. 2), e023049. https://doi.org/10.22633/rpge.v27iesp.2.18778.
Ardelean, C. (2019). Relevance of the cultural transfer in translation: False friends in media sources. Scientific Bulletin of the Politehnica University of Timisoara, Transactions on Modern Languages, 1, 18. http://www.sc.upt.ro/attachments/article/298/07%20Ardelean.pdf
Baker, W. (2022). From intercultural to transcultural communication. Language and Intercultural Communication, 22(3), 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2021.2001477
Bakhmat, N., Krasnoshchok, I., & Voron, O. (2023). International experience of using e-learning during pandemics and military conflicts. E-Learning Innovations Journal, 1(2), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.57125/ELIJ.2023.06.25.04
Bizzoni, Yu., Degaetano-Ortlieb, S., Fankhauser, P. & Teich, E. (2020). Linguistic variation and change in 250 years of English scientific writing: A data-driven approach. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 3, 73. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2020.00073
Boleda, G. (2020). Distributional semantics and linguistic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6, 213-234, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-011619-030303
Borysenko, O., Marukhovska-Kartunova, O., Volkova, V., Baran, A., & Maraieva, U. (2024). The influence of social networks on the formation of modern culture and its relationship with philosophy. Future Philosophy, 3(3), 80-94. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2024.09.30.05
Brandist, C. (2022). From literary theory to cultural studies. In Central and Eastern European Literary Theory and the West. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110400304-042
Carter, R., & Stockwell, P. (2020). The language and literature reader. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003060789
Chapman, S., & Routledge, C. (2009). Key ideas in linguistics and the philosophy of language. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748631421
Coman, D., & Selejan, C. (2019). The Limits of (Un)translatability: Culturemes in Translation Practice. Transylvanian Review, 28. https://acortar.link/fBydlo
Coombe, C., Vafadar, H., & Mohebbi, H. (2020). Language assessment literacy: What do we need to learn, unlearn, and relearn? Language Testing in Asia, 10(1), 1-16. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40468-020-00101-6
Demirel, H.H., & Korkut, U.I. (2019). Cross-cultural transfer in translation: translator preferences in translating cultural elements from Turkish to English in Madonna in a fur coat by Sabahattin Ali. International Journal of Educational Technology and Learning, 5(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.20448/2003.51.1.8
Demiryay, N. (2022). Literary translation as a form of conveying cultural aspects (an approach to translatability from German into Turkish). Synesis, 14(2), 383-395. https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2337
Dmytrenko, V., Khairulina, N., Brovko, O., Kryzhanovska, O., & Perepadia, D. (2024). Cross-cultural discourse of philological studies: The advanced approaches. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7, 2024spe020. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024spe020
Dwight, B.W. (2022). Modern Philology. BoD-Books on Demand. https://acortar.link/pR9nVl
Frumkina, A.L., Diachenko, M.D., Poliezhaiev, Yu.H. Savina, N.B., & Hadi, F. (2020). Readiness of future teachers for integrated teaching of educational subjects in foreign language. Práxis Educacional, Vitória da Conquista, 16(38), 502-514. https://periodicos2.uesb.br/index.php/praxis/article/view/6023
Frye, N. (2020). Anatomy of criticism: Four essays. Vol. 70. Princeton University Press. https://acortar.link/Jr2sVZ
Grebennikova, V., Bonkalo, T., Rudenko, E., Us, O., & Malkov, A. (2023). Spiritual and moral sovereignty of personality in information society: A subjective environmental approach. Synesis, 15(4), 100-112. https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2722
Greenwood, E. (2022). Introduction: Classical philology, otherhow. American Journal of Philology, 143(2), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1353/ajp.2022.0012
Hamaniuk, V.A., & Karpiuk, V. (2023). 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Linguistics, Literature and Language Education. ACNS Conference Series: Social Sciences and Humanities, 3, 01001 https://elibrary.kdpu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/7403
Helle, S. (2022). What Is philology? From crises of reading to comparative reflections. Poetics Today, 43(4), 611-637. https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-10017681
Hong Van, Vu. (2022). Education patriotism from education of traditional cultural values. Synesis, 14(2), 119-134. https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2196
Imola, N. (2024). From realia to culturemes. The problem of culture-bound words in translation. The dialogue of multicultural discourses. Synesis, 16(1), 569-585. https://ibn.idsi.md/sites/default/files/imag_file/LDMD-08%20Lite_2020.pdf#page=569
Jalilbayli, O.B. (2022). Philosophy of linguistic culture and new perspectives in modern Azerbaijani linguistics. Future Philosophy, 1(4), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.12.30.05
Jameson, F. (2020). The prison-house of language: A critical account of structuralism and Russian formalism. New Jersey: Princeton University Press. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5580002
Jauss, H.R. (2022). Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. In New directions in literary history, pp. 11-41. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.2307/468585
Klassen, N. (2022). Rationality Is... The Essence of Literary Theory. Wipf and Stock Publishers. https://philpapers.org/rec/KLARIT
Klymenko, O., & Yenikeyeva, S. (2022). Synergetic linguistics as a new philosophy of language studies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(2), 417-423. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1202.28
Komisar, L., Savolainen, I., Belia, V., Borovska, L., & Lipin, M. (2024). Metadisciplinarity at the intersection of modern philosophical and philological practices. Amazonia Investiga, 13(75), 211-220. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.75.03.18
Kozlova, T., & Polyezhayev, Yu. (2022). A cognitive-pragmatic study of Australian English phraseology. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.33543/12018593
Lanza, D., & Ugolini, G. (2022). History of classical philology: from Bentley to the 20th century, Vol. 2. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110730388
Li, J., & Zhu, X. (2022). A bibliometric study of the research field of experimental philosophy of language. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 4(1), 18-35. https://philpapers.org/rec/LIABSD-2
Martin, M.R. (2022), Psychoanalysis and literary theory: an introduction. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003219347
Metu, I.C., Agu, N.N., & Eleje, L.I. (2024). Students' perceptions of and preferences for assessment feedback in higher education: Implication for evaluators. Future of Social Sciences, 2(2), 21-37. https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2024.06.20.02
Mizumoto, M. (2023). Experimental philosophy and ordinary language philosophy. In Experimental Philosophy of Language: Perspectives, Methods, and Prospects (pp. 31-56). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-28908-8_3
Mühlebach, D. (2022). Non-ideal philosophy of language. Inquiry, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2074884
Paulson, W. (2019). The noise of culture: Literary texts in a world of information. Cornell University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctvv4160g
Popova, O., Grushevskaya, E., Zelenskaya, V., Golubtsov, S., & Grushevskaya, T. (2019). Language, culture, society at the intersection of modern scientific disciplines. In International Conference on Man-Power-Law-Governance: Interdisciplinary Approaches (MPLG-IA 2019). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/mplg-ia-19.2019.12
Pountain, Ch.J. (2019). Modern languages as an academic discipline: the linguistic component. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(3), 244-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2019.1661153
Prasad, K., & Vaidya, R. (2023). The application of learning analytics to support the students in higher education. Synesis, 15(1), 183-194. https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/2441
Ramadanovic, P. (2021). Interdiscipline: a future for literary studies and the humanities. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003119616
Redko, K., Riznyk, D., Nikolaiev, S., Yatsenko, O., & Shuplat, O. (2024). The role of investment in creating a sustainable financial future: strategies and tools. Future Economics & Law, 4(3), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2024.09.25.02
Shykyrynska, O. (2022). Areas of interdisciplinary studies in historical context. Journal of Danubian Studies and Research, 12(2). https://dj.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/JDSR/article/view/1862
Skrypnyk, A., Lytvyn, N., Kholod, I., Didenko, N., & Ivashchuk, A. (2024). Linguistic imagology as a new approach to the analysis of linguistic images: methods and theoretical aspects. Amazonia Investiga 13(73), 220-230. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.73.01.18
Torchynska, N., Shymanska, V., Gontsa, I., & Dudenko, O. (2021). Intertextuality as an integral component of the modern Ukrainian discourse (on the example of literary and journalistic styles). Postmodern Openings, 12(4), 255-271. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/12.4/373
Xiao, Yu., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971
Yuhan, N., Оsipchuk H.., Siroshtan, T., Prykhodko, V., & Mytiay, Z. (2024). Synergy of philological disciplines: combining the vectors of linguistics and literary studies in the context of modern science. Synesis, 16(2), 19-32. https://seer.ucp.br/seer/index.php/synesis/article/view/3030
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Natalia Syvachuk, Nataliia Yuhan, Viktoriia Posmitna, Natalia Opryshko, Nataliia Kobzei
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.