Evaluación de un marco de aprendizaje activo mediado por TIC: Un estudio cuasi-experimental en la educación superior ucraniana

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2025.19.04.15

Palabras clave:

aprendizaje activo, Aprendizaje semipresencial, aula invertida, Educación Superior, TIC, Aprendizaje en Línea, Ucrania

Resumen

Esta investigación llena una brecha significativa en la investigación empírica sobre la transformación digital impulsada pedagógicamente en la educación superior ucraniana. Evalúa un modelo estructurado de aprendizaje activo mediado por TIC que integra el aula invertida y herramientas digitales colaborativas mediante Moodle. Un estudio cuasi-experimental de 16 semanas con estudiantes de sociología (N=92) comparó este modelo con la enseñanza tradicional. Los resultados mostraron que el grupo experimental alcanzó un rendimiento académico (p < .001), una competencia digital (p < .001) y un compromiso significativamente superior, medidos mediante analíticas del LMS y encuestas. La novedad científica consiste en ser la primera prueba cuasi-experimental integral de un marco de aprendizaje activo mediado por TIC que evalúa simultáneamente rendimiento, competencia digital y compromiso en universidades ucranianas. Las recomendaciones prácticas incluyen implementar formación docente estructurada sobre diseño de aprendizaje activo, establecer unidades centralizadas de apoyo digital y adoptar programas piloto por fases para una transformación sostenible. El estudio ofrece así una validación empírica y una hoja de ruta aplicada para integrar las TIC en la reforma educativa de Ucrania.

Biografía del autor/a

Lesia Honcharenko, Sumy Branch of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Sumy, Ukraine.

Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor, Sumy Branch of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, Sumy, Ukraine.

Yurii Shevchuk, DataArt, Northbrook, Illinois, USA.

Master’s Degree, Software Engineer and Cybersecurity Expert, DataArt, Northbrook, Illinois, USA.

Oksana Fedotova, Mariupol State University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Doctor of Historical Sciences, Senior Research Officer, Professor, Department of Information Activities, Faculty of Philology and Mass Communications, Mariupol State University, Kyiv, Ukraine.

Olena Samborska, Khmelnytskyi National University, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

PhD in Pedagogy, Associate Professor, Head of Department of Technological and Professional Education and Decorative Arts, Faculty of Humanities and Pedagogy, Khmelnytskyi National University, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine.

Vasyl Vasiuta, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic», Poltava, Ukraine.

PhD in Technical Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Computer and Information Technologies and Systems, Educational and Research Institute of Information Technologies and Robotics, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic», Poltava, Ukraine.

Citas

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Bernasconi, A. (2025). Latin America: Weak academic freedom within strong university autonomy. Global Constitutionalism, 14(1), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204538172400011X

Bitar, N., & Davidovich, N. (2024). Transforming pedagogy: The digital revolution in higher education. Education Sciences, 14(8), 811. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14080811

Bracco, J., Ciaschi, M., Gasparini, L., Marchionni, M., & Neidhöfer, G. (2025). The impact of COVID‐19 on education in Latin America: Long‐run implications for poverty and inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 71(1), e12687. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12687

Cabero-Almenara, J., Gutiérrez-Castillo, J. J., Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Gaete-Bravo, A. F. (2023). Digital competence of higher education students as a predictor of academic success. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(2), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09624-8

Cerdá Suárez, L. M., Núñez-Valdés, K., & Quirós y Alpera, S. (2021). A systemic perspective for understanding digital transformation in higher education: Overview and subregional context in Latin America as evidence. Sustainability, 13(23), 12956. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132312956

Chiu, T. K. (2021). Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909

Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and education. The Educational Forum, 50(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131728609335764

Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & López-Meneses, E. (2024). Fostering motivation: Exploring the impact of ICTs on the learning of students with autism. Children, 11(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11010119

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=2iaR5FOsoMcC

Govender, I. (2025). Digital literacy and STEM skills – What is the connection? A systematic review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09879-x

Kniazieva, T. V., Kazanska, O. O., Orochovska, L. A., Tsymbalenko, Y. Y., & Dergach, A. V. (2023). Analysis of the impact of digitalization on the quality and availability of public services in Ukraine – A comparative approach with insights from Estonia. Statistics, Politics and Policy, 14(3), 375–398. https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2023-0012

Kulichenko, A., Shramko, R., Rakhno, M., & Polyezhayev, Y. (2023). Two-dimension educational resistance in the modern Ukrainian tertiary educational establishment. Apuntes Universitarios, 13(1), 474–493. https://doi.org/10.17162/au.v13i1.1351

Lezama, E. E., Cabrera Echegaray, S. H., Rugel Medina, M. N., Carbajal Destre, P. E., & Ninaquispe Soto, M. E. (2023). Appropriation of information technologies during remote university education in Latin America. LACCEI, 1(8). https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2023.1.1.285

Martín-Rodríguez, A., & Madrigal-Cerezo, R. (2025). Technology-enhanced pedagogy in physical education: Bridging engagement, learning, and lifelong activity. Education Sciences, 15(4), 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15040409

Miralrio, A., Muñoz-Villota, J., & Camacho-Zuñiga, C. (2024). From flexibility to adaptive learning: A pre-COVID-19 perspective on distance education in Latin America. Frontiers in Computer Science, 6, 1250992. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2024.1250992

Morgulets, O. B., & Derkach, T. M. (2019). Information and communication technologies managing the quality of educational activities of a university. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 71(3), 295–304. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v71i3.2831

Okoye, K., Hussein, H., Arrona-Palacios, A., Quintero, H. N., Ortega, L. O. P., Sanchez, A. L., & Hosseini, S. (2023). Impact of digital technologies upon teaching and learning in higher education in Latin America: An outlook on the reach, barriers, and bottlenecks. Education and Information Technologies, 28(2), 2291–2360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11214-1

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International University Press. https://acortar.link/NCwumG

Polyezhayev, Y., Terletska, L., Kulichenko, A., Vorobiova, L., & Snizhko, N. (2024). The role of web applications in the development of multilingual competence in CLIL courses in higher education. Revista Eduweb, 18(3), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2024.18.03.9

Rehman, T. U. (2025). The transformative impact and evolving landscape: A comprehensive exploration of the globalization of higher education in the 21st century. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 49(3), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2025.2457537

Remesal, A., & Villarroel, V. (2023). Challenges for post-pandemic virtual education in Latin America: A comparative analysis of the emergency remote higher education process in Chile, Mexico, and Ecuador. Sustainability, 15(19), 14199. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914199

Szadkowski, K. (2025). For the society as a whole: Higher education and the public good in Poland. Higher Education, 89(1), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01278-y

Useche, A. C., Galvis, Á. H., Díaz-Barriga Arceo, F., Patiño Rivera, A. E., & Muñoz-Reyes, C. (2022). Reflexive pedagogy at the heart of educational digital transformation in Latin American higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00365-3

Villa-Castaño, L. E., & Durán León, W. F. (2022). Satisfaction of business students with the quality of classes during the pandemic: A mixed study in the Latin American context. Research in Comparative and International Education, 17(4), 548–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/17454999221113125

Villalobos Díaz, E., Hilliger, I., Gonzalez, C., Celis, S., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Broisin, J. (2024). The mediating role of learning analytics: Insights into student approaches to learning and academic achievement in Latin America. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8149

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=RxjjUefze_oC

Zayachuk, Y. (2025). Ensuring quality higher education in Ukraine in times of war. Journal of Adult and Continuing Education, 31(1), 135–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714241270254

Publicado

2025-12-30

Cómo citar

Honcharenko, L., Shevchuk, Y., Fedotova, O., Samborska, O., & Vasiuta, V. (2025). Evaluación de un marco de aprendizaje activo mediado por TIC: Un estudio cuasi-experimental en la educación superior ucraniana. Revista Eduweb, 19(4), 259–271. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2025.19.04.15

Número

Sección

Articles

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a