ICT and modern technologies for training professional mediators in restorative justice and related processes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2025.19.04.11

Keywords:

ICT, professional training, digital technologies, restorative justice, mediation, online environment, artificial intelligence

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to determine the role and potential of information and communication technologies and modern digital tools in the system of training professional mediators in the field of restorative justice and related processes, as well as in developing approaches to integrating these technologies into educational programs. The research methodology consists of the following methods: comparative analysis method, policy analysis method, empirical method and system method. The study found that the integration of modern information and communication technologies into the system of training mediators in the field of restorative justice contributes to increasing the efficiency of the educational process and professional activities of specialists. The use of digital platforms and online environments provides the opportunity to conduct trainings, simulations and role-playing games in a remote format, which significantly expands access to training and increases its flexibility. The models of application of videoconferencing technologies, interactive software solutions and artificial intelligence tools and their role in forming in future mediators the digital competencies necessary for effective work with participants in restorative processes in various social and legal contexts were analyzed. A number of challenges associated with the use of ICT were identified, including issues of ethics, protection of personal data, adaptation of training methods to online environments and preservation of the authenticity of restorative dialogue. The results obtained confirm the need to develop comprehensive training programs for mediators that combine traditional training methods with innovative technological approaches, contributing to the formation of a new generation of specialists capable of operating in a digital society.

Author Biographies

Оlha Shmyndruk, The National University of Ostroh Academy, Ostroh, Ukraine.

PhD., Associate Professor of the Department of Civil and Legal Disciplines of The National University of Ostroh Academy, Ostroh, Ukraine.

Nataliia Ustrytska, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine.

PhD., Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law Disciplines of the Educational and Scientific Institute of Law and Law Enforcement Activities of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine.

Iryna Serkevych, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine.

PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law Disciplines of the Educational and Scientific Institute of Law and Law Enforcement Activities of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine.

Polina Baltadzhy, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine.

PhD in Law, Professor of the Department of State and Legal Disciplines, Institute of Law and Security, Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Odesa, Ukraine.

Ilona Yasin, Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine.

PhD in Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law Disciplines of the Educational and Scientific Institute of Law and Law Enforcement Activities of the Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv, Ukraine.

References

Barjau, J., & Biffi, E. (2021). Training trainers in mediation and restorative justice. European Forum for Restorative Justice. Retrieved from https://www.euforumrj.org/sites/default/files/2022-04/AFMediarejHandbook_01.22.pdf

Bonensteffen, F., Zebel, S., & Giebels, E. (2022). Is computer-based communication a valuable addition to victim-offender mediation? A qualitative exploration among victims, offenders and mediators. Victims & Offenders, 17(8), 1173–1195. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2021.2020946

Carneiro, D., Novais, P., Andrade, F., Zeleznikow, J., & Neves, J. (2012). Context-aware environments for online dispute resolution. In Proceedings of GDN 2012 – The 12th International Conference of the Group Decision and Negotiation (pp. 1–12). Brazil: Recife. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/55624137.pdf

Council of Europe Office in Ukraine. (2024). Council of Europe presents the launch of the specialized training program of mediators: Mediation in restorative justice involving minors. Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/1y1MsH

Davydova, I., Andronov, I., Zhurylo, S., Zubar, V., & Iliopol, I. (2023). Perspectivas del uso de la inteligencia artificial en la jurisprudencia: del proceso educativo a la práctica jurídica. La experiencia de China. Revista Eduweb, 17(4), 87–95. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2023.17.04.9

Dontsov, D., NeugоdnikovA., Bignyak, O., Kharytonova, O., & Panova, L. (2021). Mediación online en la cuarentena provocada por la pandemia COVID-19. Cuestiones Políticas, 39(68), 914-926. Retrieved from https://produccioncientificaluz.org/index.php/cuestiones/article/view/35459

Freitas, P. M., & Palermo, P. G. (2016). Restorative justice and technology. In Interdisciplinary perspectives on contemporary conflict resolution (pp. 15–35). IGI Global. Retrieved from https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/restorative-justice-and-technology/150039

Gazi, Z., & Altınay-Aksal, F. (2017). Technology as a mediation tool for improving teaching profession in higher education practices. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 803–813. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/9W7pX3

Government of Canada. (2022). The effects of restorative justice programming: A review of the empirical. Department of Justice Canada. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rr00_16/p2.htm

Hollósvölgyi, M. (2025). What does restorative justice promise? European Journal of Probation, 17(1), 21-34. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/20662203251319907

Innovative Prison Systems. (2023). Mediation and restorative justice practices in Europe: Improving the probation process. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/KGVqab

Kumar, R., & Singh, B. D. (2024). The rise of the robo-mediator: AI’s transformative role in alternative dispute resolution. White Black Legal, 3(1), 1–11. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5222318

Marder, I. D. (2022). Mapping restorative justice and restorative practices in criminal justice in the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 70, 100544. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100544

Marshall, F. T. (1999). Restorative justice: An overview. Home Office, Research Development and Statistics Directorate. Retrieved from http://www.antoniocasella.eu/restorative/Marshall_1999-b.pdf

Mayer, B. (2018). Conflict resolution for the helping professions: Negotiation, mediation, advocacy, facilitation, and restorative justice [Book review]. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 38(4), 446–450. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2018.1489656

Menkel-Meadow, C. (2016). The case for mediation: The things that mediators should be learning and doing. Arbitration. The International Journal of Arbitration, Mediation and Dispute Management, 82(1), 22–33. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/WnvK89

Musgrave, T., Bell, A., & Schoenebeck, S. (2025). Techno-mediated justice: How restorative justice practitioners use videoconferencing platforms and what HCI can learn from them. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 9(2). Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3711081

Park University. (2024). The role of restorative justice in modern criminal justice administration. Retrieved from https://www.park.edu/blog/the-role-of-restorative-justice-in-modern-criminal-justice-administration/

Pereira, A. C., Craen, B. D., & Aertsen, I. (2023). Restorative justice training for judges and public prosecutors in the European Union: What is on offer and where are the gaps? The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 6(1), 45–68. Retrieved from https://brill.com/view/journals/tij/6/1/article-p45_4.xml

Scheuerman, H. L., & Keith, S. (2023). Importance of victims: How does offense type affect restoration and reparation in restorative justice conferencing? TEMIDA, 26(3), 325–343. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2298/TEM2303325S

Romero-Seseña, P. (2025). Applicability and uses of the online environment in restorative mediation: Towards a digital restorative justice? Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 37(1), 75–93. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2024.2319919

Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. (2024). Digital tools in restorative justice: A useful complement. Retrieved from https://www.uoc.edu/en/news/2024/digital-tools-in-restorative-justice

Varfi, T., Parmentier, S., & Aertsen, I. (2014). Developing judicial training for restorative justice: Towards a European approach. European Forum for Restorative Justice. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/bzQIrf

Wählisch, M. (2024). AI and the future of mediation. In T. Whitfield (Ed.), Still time to talk: Adaptation and innovation in peace mediation (pp. 112–114). Accord, vol. 30. Conciliation Resources. Retrieved from https://www.c-r.org/accord/still-time-to-talk

Wijaya, F., & Sari, D. (2024). A restorative approach in the solution of difficulties in digital health services in Indonesia. Indonesian Health Law Journal, 10(1), 77–92.

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Shmyndruk О., Ustrytska, N., Serkevych, I., Baltadzhy, P., & Yasin, I. (2025). ICT and modern technologies for training professional mediators in restorative justice and related processes. Eduweb, 19(4), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2025.19.04.11

Issue

Section

Articles