Mejorar la educación en derecho penal, procesal y forense mediante las TIC y la integración de la práctica del CEDH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2026.20.02.12Palabras clave:
TIC, currículo, educación, proceso penal, derecho procesal penal, investigación previa al juicioResumen
El rápido desarrollo de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) ofrece oportunidades para la enseñanza innovadora y el aprendizaje interactivo en la formación jurídica, especialmente en derecho penal, procedimiento penal y criminología. Este estudio tiene como objetivo fundamentar los principios teóricos y prácticos para mejorar el proceso educativo mediante la integración de las TIC y la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos (TEDH), a la vez que ofrece recomendaciones para optimizar la formación de futuros profesionales del derecho. El estudio emplea un enfoque conceptual y normativo, que combina el análisis jurídico doctrinal y comparativo, el análisis de políticas y la modelización conceptual, utilizando fuentes secundarias para desarrollar un marco que integre las herramientas de las TIC con los estándares del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos en la formación jurídica. El estudio identifica los métodos más eficaces para analizar los precedentes del TEDH dentro del proceso educativo y subraya el papel del aprendizaje interactivo en el desarrollo de competencias profesionales. Se abordan los riesgos asociados a la implementación de las TIC, incluidas las limitaciones técnicas y los retos pedagógicos, junto con estrategias para su mitigación. Los resultados demuestran que la combinación de las TIC con las normas jurídicas internacionales mejora la modernización de la formación jurídica y la calidad de la formación especializada, así como su eficacia general.
Citas
Baadzhi, N. P. (2023). The latest tools of legal education in the age of artificial intelligence. Legal Scientific Electronic Journal, (12), 233–239. Retrieved from http://lsej.org.ua/12_2023/57.pdf
Council of Europe. (1950, November 4). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of November 4, 1950. European Convention on Human Rights (E.T.S. No. 5; 213 U.N.T.S. 221). Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/european-convention-on-human-rights
Chaussée, A. S., Winter, J., & Ayres, P. (2022). Approaches to decolonising forensic curricula. Science & Justice, 62(6), 795–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.06.003
Custers, B., & Stevens, L. (2024). Data as Evidence in Criminal Courts. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009431453.014
de Sousa Santos, B. (2021). Decolonising the University: The Challenge of Deep Cognitive Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.
Donnelly, S. (2012). Forensic Science in a Human Rights Framework. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2011.610822
Dryshliuk, V., Chanysheva, A., Borychenko, K., Kravchenko, S., & Hotsuliak, Y. (2025). Application of the practice of the ECHR in legal education: impact on the formation of judicial culture and the protection of human rights. Revista Eduweb, 19(2), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2025.19.02.8
European Education Area. (2025). Digital Education Action Plan: Policy background. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/plan
FRA. (2019). Rights in practice: access to a lawyer and procedural rights in criminal and European arrest warrant proceedings. Retrieved from https://acortar.link/dIqP2A
Jeffery, A. J., Rogers, S. L., & Jeffery, K. L. A., & Hobson, L. (2021). A flexible, open, and interactive digital platform to support online and blended experiential learning environments: Thinglink and thin sections. Geosci. Commun, 4, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-95-2021
Lorente, L. M. L., Arrabal, A. A., & Pulido-Montes, C. (2020). The Right to Education and ICT during COVID-19: An International Perspective. Sustainability, 12(21), 9091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219091
Lundy, L., & Martínez Sainz, G. (2018). The Role of Law and Legal Knowledge for a Transformative Human Rights Education: Addressing Violations of Children’s Rights in Formal Education. Human Rights Education Review, 1(2), 04–24. https://doi.org/10.7577/hrer.2560
Matvienko, O., & Tsyvin, M. (2024). “OSINT technologies” as an educational component of the specialty “Information, library and archival studies”: pedagogical goal-setting. Ukrainian Journal of Library and Information Sciences, (13), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.31866/2616-7654.13.2024.307136
Mayne, R., & Green, H. (2020). Virtual reality for teaching and learning in crime scene investigation. Science & Justice, 60(5), 466–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2020.07.006
McBride, J. (2009). Human rights and criminal procedure. Case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/pub_coe_criminal_procedure_2009_eng
McBride, J. (2021). The doctrines and methodology of interpretation of the European Convention of Human Rights by the European Court of human rights. Council of Europe Publishing. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/echr-eng-the-doctrines-and-methodology-of-interpretation-of-the-europe/1680a20aee
Muntjewerff, A. J. (2009). ICT in Legal Education. German Law Journal, 10(6–7), 669–716. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200001292
Nilendu, D. (2024). Enhancing forensic education: exploring the importance and implementation of evidence-based education system. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-023-00375-w
Nilupu-Moreno, K., Riega-Virú, Y., Puga-Ayala, E. M., & Salas-Riega, J. L. (2024). Legaltech in legal education: A systematic review of the training of technological competencies. IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALTER65499.2024.10819225
Law of Ukraine No. 1906-IV. On International Treaties of Ukraine. (2004, June 29). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1906-15
Law of Ukraine No. 3477-IV. On the Execution of Decisions and Application of the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights. (2006, February 23). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3477-15/ed20121202
Pringle, J., Stimpson, I., Jeffery, A., Wisniewski, K., Grossey, T., Hobson, L., Heaton, V., Zholobenko, V., & Rogers, S. (2022). Extended reality (XR) virtual practical and educational eGaming to provide effective immersive environments for learning and teaching in forensic science. Science & Justice, 62(6), 696–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2022.04.004
Selwyn, N. (2007). The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
Salazar Chica, M. A., & Palencia Salas, V. (2025). Teacher training in ICT and learning technologies: A bibliometric analysis. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 17(1), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.52783/crlsj.542
Torbas, O. O. (2024). OSINT in the investigation of criminal offenses. Odesa, Ukraine: Jurydika. https://doi.org/10.32837/11300.27740
Vuille, J., Lupària, L., & Taroni, F. (2017). Scientific evidence and the right to a fair trial under Article 6 ECHR. Law, Probability & Risk, 16(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/lpr/mgx001
Yu, Y. (2023). Discussion on the Reform of Higher Legal Education in China Based on the Application and Limitation of Artificial Intelligence in Law Represented by ChatGPT. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 14, 220–228. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v14i.8840
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2026 Dmytro Baranenko, Zoriana Dilna, Ruslan Komisarchuk, Anastasiia Khylchenko, Veronika Ivanova
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
