Prácticas de examen en línea en una institución de educación superior del Perú

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2021.15.03.2

Palabras clave:

Examen en línea, educación superior, percepción de los estudiantes.

Resumen

El propósito de este estudio fue examinar las percepciones de los estudiantes sobre las prácticas de exámenes en línea en una Universidad del Perú. La investigación es de diseño no experimental, de tipo básica; se empleó como instrumento el cuestionario en línea aplicado a 432 estudiantes de pregrado. Los resultados muestran la percepción que los exámenes en línea tienen beneficios significativos sobre los exámenes tradicionales basados en papel, la confiabilidad de la calificación y la eficiencia en términos de tiempo, esfuerzo y dinero. La implementación exitosa de éstos depende de diseñarlos para que sean válidos, confiables, seguros y flexibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Roberto Carlos Dávila Morán, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Perú.

Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Perú.

Eucaris del Carmen Agüero Corzo, Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador, Maturín, Venezuela.

Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertador, Maturín, Venezuela.

Citas

Anusha, N. S., Soujanya, T. S., & Vasavi, D. S. (2012). Study on techniques for providing enhanced security during online exams. International Journal of Engineering Inventions, 1(1), 32-37.

Ayo, C. K., Akinyemi, I. O., Adebiyi, A. A., & Ekong, U. O. (2007). The prospects of e-examination implementation in Nigeria. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(4), 125-134.

Baleni, Z. G. (2015). Online formative assessment in higher education: Its pros and cons. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(4), 228-236.

Bernik, I. , & Jereb, E. (2006). Students’ readiness for electronic examinations’. En Proceedings of the 5th WSEAS International Conference on Education and Educational Technology (págs. 142-145). Tenerife.

Chua, Y. P., & Don, Z. M. (2013). Effects of computer-based educational achievement test on test performance and test takers’ motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), 1889-1895.

Dermo, J. (2009). e‐Assessment and the student learning experience: A survey of student perceptions of e‐assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 203-214.

Dreher, C., Reiners, T., & Dreher, H. (2011). Investigating factors affecting the uptake of automated assessment technology. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 10(1), 161-181.

Farzin, S. (2017). Attitude of Students Towards E-Examination System: an Application of E-Learning. Science Journal of Education, 4(6), 222.

Gershon, R. C. (2005). Computer adaptive testing. Journal of applied measurement, 6(1), 109-127.

Heinrich, E., Milne, J., & Moore, M. (2009). An investigation into e-tool use for formative assignment assessment–status and recommendations. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 176-192.

Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2010). Metodología de la Investigación (Sexta ed.). Madrid: McGraw Hill.

Hodgson, P., & Pang, M. Y. (2012). Effective formative e-assessment of student learning: a study on a statistics course. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(2), 215-225.

James, R. (2016). Tertiary student attitudes to invigilated, online summative examinations. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1-13.

Jamil, M., Tariq, R. H., & Shami, P. A. (2012). Computer-based vs paper-based examinations: Perceptions of university teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 371-381.

Jordan, S. (2013). E-assessment: Past, present and future. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 9(1), 87-106.

Kuikka, M., Kitola, M., & Laakso, M. J. (2014). Challenges when introducing electronic exam. Research in Learning Technology, 22(1), 1-17.

McGarvey, D. J., & Haxton, K. J. (2011). Using audio for feedback on assessments: Tutor and student experiences. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 7, 5-9.

Nicol, D. (2007). E‐assessment by design: using multiple‐choice tests to good effect. Journal of Further and higher Education, 31(1), 53-64.

Osuji, U. S. (2012). The use of e-assessments in the Nigerian higher education system. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(4), 140-152.

Sarrayrih, M. A., & Ilyas, M. (2013). Challenges of online exam, performances and problems for online university exam. International Journal of Computer Science Issues (IJCSI), 10(1), 439-443.

Shraim, K., & Crompton, H. (2015). Perceptions of Using Smart Mobile Devices in Higher Education Teaching: A Case Study from Palestine. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(4), 301-318.

Sorensen, E. (2013). Implementation and student perceptions of e-assessment in a Chemical Engineering module. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(2), 172-185.

Whitelock, D. (2006). Electronic assessment: marking, monitoring and mediating learning. International Journal of Learning Technology, 2(2-3), 264-276.

Descargas

Publicado

2021-11-30

Cómo citar

Dávila Morán, R. C. ., & Agüero Corzo, E. del C. . (2021). Prácticas de examen en línea en una institución de educación superior del Perú. Revista Eduweb, 15(3), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2021.15.03.2

Número

Sección

Articles