Interactive digital tools for developing university students' professional competence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2026.20.03.17Keywords:
interactive digital tools, the formation of professional competence of students, universities, digital platforms, educational digital environment.Abstract
The article examines the effectiveness of interactive digital tools in developing the professional competence of university students. The study analyzes the potential and limitations of digital platforms integrated into the university's educational digital environment and substantiates pedagogical conditions for their systematic use in professional training. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 188 first-year university students, including an experimental group (EG; n = 93) and a control group (CG; n = 95). At the ascertaining stage, the majority of students in both groups demonstrated a low level of professional competence, confirming the need for targeted pedagogical intervention. During the formative stage, the experimental group participated in an author's special course and a system of pedagogical conditions involving the systematic integration of interactive digital tools, collaborative learning, digital communication, independent activities, and interactive assessment, whereas the control group continued studying according to the traditional educational approach. At the control stage, the experimental group demonstrated substantially higher proportions of students with a high level of professional competence across all assessed criteria. According to the cognitive criterion, 60.22% of EG students achieved a high level compared with 13.68% in CG; according to the activity-operational criterion, the corresponding proportions were 59.14% and 18.95%; and according to the personal criterion, 53.76% and 17.89%, respectively. Figure 1 also demonstrated greater increases in the proportion of students with a high level in EG across all criteria. These findings indicate that the systematic pedagogical integration of interactive digital tools was associated with substantially greater improvements in professional competence in the experimental group than in the control group.
References
Aagaard, T., & Lund, A. (2020). A response to digitalization: Professional digital competence. In T. Aagaard & A. Lund (Eds.), Digital agency in higher education: Transforming teaching and learning (pp. 71–83). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020629
Carpenter, J. P., Rosenberg, J. M., Kessler, A., Romero-Hall, E., & Fischer, C. (2024). The importance of context in teacher educators’ professional digital competence. Teachers and Teaching, 30(4), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2320155
Dang, T. D., Phan, T. T., Vu, T. N. Q., La, T. D., & Pham, V. K. (2024). Digital competence of lecturers and its impact on student learning value in higher education. Heliyon, 10(17), e37318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37318
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development: Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
García Chamorro, M. C., & Rolong Gamboa, M. T. (2025). Professional competence development in practicum: A holistic teacher profile construction. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 27(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.21809
González-Rodríguez, C., & Urbina-Ramírez, S. (2020). Análisis de instrumentos para el diagnóstico de la competencia digital. RiiTE: Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 9, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.411101
Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J., & García, M. G. (2023). Digital competence of teachers in the use of ICT for research work: Development of an instrument from a PLS-SEM approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16509–16529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11895-2
Ifenthaler, D., & Egloffstein, M. (2020). Development and implementation of a maturity model of digital transformation. TechTrends, 64(2), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00457-4
Lindfors, M., Pettersson, F., & Olofsson, A. D. (2021). Conditions for professional digital competence: The teacher educators’ view. Education Inquiry, 12(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1890936
López Simó, V., Couso Lagarón, D., & Simarro Rodríguez, C. (2020). Educación STEM en y para el mundo digital: El papel de las herramientas digitales en el desempeño de prácticas científicas, ingenieriles y matemáticas. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 20(62). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.410011
Palshkov, K., Yaromenko, O., Pilishek, S., Golinska, T., Batenko, H., Lushchan, T., & Kuchai, O. (2026). Gamification in higher education: An experimental study. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 18(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.66388/rrem/18.2/36
Pedersen, C., Aagaard, T., Daus, S., Nagel, I., Amdam, S. H., Vika, K. S., Rokenes, F. M., & Andreasen, J. K. (2024). Profiling teacher educators' strategies for professional digital competence development. Teachers and Teaching, 30(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2336612
Zadorina, O., Hurskaya, V., Sobolyeva, S., Grekova, L., & Vasylyuk-Zaitseva, S. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in creation of future education: Possibilities and challenges. Futurity Education, 4(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2024.06.25.09
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Oksana Romanyshyna, Mykhailo Stepanov, Yevhenii Antonov, Ljudmyla Konstantynenko, Oleh Ieresko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.












