Interactive digital tools for developing university students' professional competence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2026.20.03.17

Keywords:

interactive digital tools, the formation of professional competence of students, universities, digital platforms, educational digital environment.

Abstract

The article examines the effectiveness of interactive digital tools in developing the professional competence of university students. The study analyzes the potential and limitations of digital platforms integrated into the university's educational digital environment and substantiates pedagogical conditions for their systematic use in professional training. A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 188 first-year university students, including an experimental group (EG; n = 93) and a control group (CG; n = 95). At the ascertaining stage, the majority of students in both groups demonstrated a low level of professional competence, confirming the need for targeted pedagogical intervention. During the formative stage, the experimental group participated in an author's special course and a system of pedagogical conditions involving the systematic integration of interactive digital tools, collaborative learning, digital communication, independent activities, and interactive assessment, whereas the control group continued studying according to the traditional educational approach. At the control stage, the experimental group demonstrated substantially higher proportions of students with a high level of professional competence across all assessed criteria. According to the cognitive criterion, 60.22% of EG students achieved a high level compared with 13.68% in CG; according to the activity-operational criterion, the corresponding proportions were 59.14% and 18.95%; and according to the personal criterion, 53.76% and 17.89%, respectively. Figure 1 also demonstrated greater increases in the proportion of students with a high level in EG across all criteria. These findings indicate that the systematic pedagogical integration of interactive digital tools was associated with substantially greater improvements in professional competence in the experimental group than in the control group.

Author Biographies

Oksana Romanyshyna, Volodymyr Hnatiuk Ternopil National Pedagogical University, Ternopil, Ukraine. 

Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Informatics and Methods of Teaching Informatics, Volodymyr Hnatiuk Ternopil National Pedagogical University, Ternopil, Ukraine. 

Mykhailo Stepanov, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine. 

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Senior Researcher Fellow in Information Technologies. Professor, Department of Applied Radio Electronics, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”, Kyiv, Ukraine. 

Yevhenii Antonov, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine. 

PhD in Educational and Pedagogical Sciences, Assistant Professor at the Department of Computer Science and Information Technologies, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine. 

Ljudmyla Konstantynenko, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine. 

PhD in Biology, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Botany, Biological Resources and Conservation of Biological Diversity, Faculty of Natural Science, Zhytomyr Ivan Franko State University, Zhytomyr, Ukraine. 

Oleh Ieresko, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Pedagogy, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

References

Aagaard, T., & Lund, A. (2020). A response to digitalization: Professional digital competence. In T. Aagaard & A. Lund (Eds.), Digital agency in higher education: Transforming teaching and learning (pp. 71–83). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429020629

Carpenter, J. P., Rosenberg, J. M., Kessler, A., Romero-Hall, E., & Fischer, C. (2024). The importance of context in teacher educators’ professional digital competence. Teachers and Teaching, 30(4), 400–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2320155

Dang, T. D., Phan, T. T., Vu, T. N. Q., La, T. D., & Pham, V. K. (2024). Digital competence of lecturers and its impact on student learning value in higher education. Heliyon, 10(17), e37318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37318

Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development: Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389

García Chamorro, M. C., & Rolong Gamboa, M. T. (2025). Professional competence development in practicum: A holistic teacher profile construction. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 27(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.21809

González-Rodríguez, C., & Urbina-Ramírez, S. (2020). Análisis de instrumentos para el diagnóstico de la competencia digital. RiiTE: Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 9, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.411101

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J., & García, M. G. (2023). Digital competence of teachers in the use of ICT for research work: Development of an instrument from a PLS-SEM approach. Education and Information Technologies, 28(12), 16509–16529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11895-2

Ifenthaler, D., & Egloffstein, M. (2020). Development and implementation of a maturity model of digital transformation. TechTrends, 64(2), 302–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00457-4

Lindfors, M., Pettersson, F., & Olofsson, A. D. (2021). Conditions for professional digital competence: The teacher educators’ view. Education Inquiry, 12(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1890936

López Simó, V., Couso Lagarón, D., & Simarro Rodríguez, C. (2020). Educación STEM en y para el mundo digital: El papel de las herramientas digitales en el desempeño de prácticas científicas, ingenieriles y matemáticas. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 20(62). https://doi.org/10.6018/red.410011

Palshkov, K., Yaromenko, O., Pilishek, S., Golinska, T., Batenko, H., Lushchan, T., & Kuchai, O. (2026). Gamification in higher education: An experimental study. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 18(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.66388/rrem/18.2/36

Pedersen, C., Aagaard, T., Daus, S., Nagel, I., Amdam, S. H., Vika, K. S., Rokenes, F. M., & Andreasen, J. K. (2024). Profiling teacher educators' strategies for professional digital competence development. Teachers and Teaching, 30(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2336612

Zadorina, O., Hurskaya, V., Sobolyeva, S., Grekova, L., & Vasylyuk-Zaitseva, S. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence in creation of future education: Possibilities and challenges. Futurity Education, 4(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2024.06.25.09

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Romanyshyna, O., Stepanov, M., Antonov, Y., Konstantynenko, L., & Ieresko, O. (2026). Interactive digital tools for developing university students’ professional competence. Eduweb, 20(3), 296–317. https://doi.org/10.46502/issn.1856-7576/2026.20.03.17

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)